METLIFE INC | 2013 | FY | 3


9. Derivatives
Accounting for Derivatives
See Note 1 for a description of the Company’s accounting policies for derivatives and Note 10 for information about the fair value hierarchy for derivatives.
Derivative Strategies
The Company is exposed to various risks relating to its ongoing business operations, including interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate, credit and equity market. The Company uses a variety of strategies to manage these risks, including the use of derivatives.
Derivatives are financial instruments whose values are derived from interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, credit spreads and/or other financial indices. Derivatives may be exchange-traded or contracted in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market. Certain of the Company’s OTC derivatives are cleared and settled through central clearing counterparties (“OTC-cleared”), while others are bilateral contracts between two counterparties (“OTC-bilateral”). The types of derivatives the Company uses include swaps, forwards, futures and option contracts. To a lesser extent, the Company uses credit default swaps and structured interest rate swaps to synthetically replicate investment risks and returns which are not readily available in the cash market.
Interest Rate Derivatives
The Company uses a variety of interest rate derivatives to reduce its exposure to changes in interest rates, including interest rate swaps, caps, floors, swaptions, futures and forwards.
Interest rate swaps are used by the Company primarily to reduce market risks from changes in interest rates and to alter interest rate exposure arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities (duration mismatches). In an interest rate swap, the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed rate and floating rate interest amounts as calculated by reference to an agreed notional amount. The Company utilizes interest rate swaps in fair value, cash flow and non-qualifying hedging relationships.
The Company uses structured interest rate swaps to synthetically create investments that are either more expensive to acquire or otherwise unavailable in the cash markets. These transactions are a combination of a derivative and a cash instrument such as a U.S. Treasury, agency, or other fixed maturity security. Structured interest rate swaps are included in interest rate swaps. Structured interest rate swaps are not designated as hedging instruments.
The Company purchases interest rate caps and floors primarily to protect its floating rate liabilities against rises in interest rates above a specified level, and against interest rate exposure arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities, as well as to protect its minimum rate guarantee liabilities against declines in interest rates below a specified level, respectively. In certain instances, the Company locks in the economic impact of existing purchased caps and floors by entering into offsetting written caps and floors. The Company utilizes interest rate caps and floors in non-qualifying hedging relationships.
In exchange-traded interest rate (Treasury and swap) futures transactions, the Company agrees to purchase or sell a specified number of contracts, the value of which is determined by the different classes of interest rate securities, and to post variation margin on a daily basis in an amount equal to the difference in the daily market values of those contracts. The Company enters into exchange-traded futures with regulated futures commission merchants that are members of the exchange. Exchange-traded interest rate (Treasury and swap) futures are used primarily to hedge mismatches between the duration of assets in a portfolio and the duration of liabilities supported by those assets, to hedge against changes in value of securities the Company owns or anticipates acquiring and to hedge against changes in interest rates on anticipated liability issuances by replicating Treasury or swap curve performance. The Company utilizes exchange-traded interest rate futures in non-qualifying hedging relationships.
Swaptions are used by the Company to hedge interest rate risk associated with the Company’s long-term liabilities and invested assets. A swaption is an option to enter into a swap with a forward starting effective date. In certain instances, the Company locks in the economic impact of existing purchased swaptions by entering into offsetting written swaptions. The Company pays a premium for purchased swaptions and receives a premium for written swaptions. The Company utilizes swaptions in non-qualifying hedging relationships. Swaptions are included in interest rate options.
The Company enters into interest rate forwards to buy and sell securities. The price is agreed upon at the time of the contract and payment for such a contract is made at a specified future date. The Company utilizes interest rate forwards in cash flow hedging relationships.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Derivatives
The Company uses foreign currency exchange rate derivatives including foreign currency swaps, foreign currency forwards and currency options, to reduce the risk from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates associated with its assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. The Company also uses foreign currency derivatives to hedge the foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with certain of its net investments in foreign operations.
In a foreign currency swap transaction, the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between one currency and another at a fixed exchange rate, generally set at inception, calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. The notional amount of each currency is exchanged at the inception and termination of the currency swap by each party. The Company utilizes foreign currency swaps in fair value, cash flow and non-qualifying hedging relationships.
In a foreign currency forward transaction, the Company agrees with another party to deliver a specified amount of an identified currency at a specified future date. The price is agreed upon at the time of the contract and payment for such a contract is made at the specified future date. The Company utilizes foreign currency forwards in fair value, net investment in foreign operations and non-qualifying hedging relationships.
The Company enters into currency options that give it the right, but not the obligation, to sell the foreign currency amount in exchange for a functional currency amount within a limited time at a contracted price. The contracts may also be net settled in cash, based on differentials in the foreign exchange rate and the strike price. The Company uses currency options to hedge against the foreign currency exposure inherent in certain of its variable annuity products. The Company also uses currency options as an economic hedge of foreign currency exposure related to the Company’s international subsidiaries. The Company utilizes currency options in net investment in foreign operations and non-qualifying hedging relationships.

The Company uses certain of its foreign currency denominated funding agreements to hedge portions of its net investments in foreign operations against adverse movements in exchange rates. Such contracts are included in non-derivative hedging instruments.
To a lesser extent, the Company uses exchange-traded currency futures to hedge currency mismatches between assets and liabilities. The Company utilizes exchange-traded currency futures in non-qualifying hedging relationships.
Credit Derivatives
The Company enters into purchased credit default swaps to hedge against credit-related changes in the value of its investments. In a credit default swap transaction, the Company agrees with another party to pay, at specified intervals, a premium to hedge credit risk. If a credit event occurs, as defined by the contract, the contract may be cash settled or it may be settled gross by the delivery of par quantities of the referenced investment equal to the specified swap notional in exchange for the payment of cash amounts by the counterparty equal to the par value of the investment surrendered. Credit events vary by type of issuer but typically include bankruptcy, failure to pay debt obligations, repudiation, moratorium, or involuntary restructuring. In each case, payout on a credit default swap is triggered only after the Credit Derivatives Determinations Committee of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) deems that a credit event has occurred. The Company utilizes credit default swaps in non-qualifying hedging relationships.
The Company enters into written credit default swaps to synthetically create credit investments that are either more expensive to acquire or otherwise unavailable in the cash markets. These transactions are a combination of a derivative and one or more cash instruments, such as U.S. Treasury securities, agency securities or other fixed maturity securities. These credit default swaps are not designated as hedging instruments.
The Company also enters into certain purchased and written credit default swaps held in relation to trading portfolios for the purpose of generating profits on short-term differences in price. These credit default swaps are not designated as hedging instruments.
The Company enters into forwards to lock in the price to be paid for forward purchases of certain securities. The price is agreed upon at the time of the contract and payment for the contract is made at a specified future date. When the primary purpose of entering into these transactions is to hedge against the risk of changes in purchase price due to changes in credit spreads, the Company designates these as credit forwards. The Company utilizes credit forwards in cash flow hedging relationships.
Equity Derivatives
The Company uses a variety of equity derivatives to reduce its exposure to equity market risk, including equity index options, variance swaps, exchange-traded equity futures and total rate of return swaps (“TRRs”).
Equity index options are used by the Company primarily to hedge minimum guarantees embedded in certain variable annuity products offered by the Company. To hedge against adverse changes in equity indices, the Company enters into contracts to sell the equity index within a limited time at a contracted price. The contracts will be net settled in cash based on differentials in the indices at the time of exercise and the strike price. Certain of these contracts may also contain settlement provisions linked to interest rates. In certain instances, the Company may enter into a combination of transactions to hedge adverse changes in equity indices within a pre-determined range through the purchase and sale of options. The Company utilizes equity index options in non-qualifying hedging relationships.
Equity variance swaps are used by the Company primarily to hedge minimum guarantees embedded in certain variable annuity products offered by the Company. In an equity variance swap, the Company agrees with another party to exchange amounts in the future, based on changes in equity volatility over a defined period. The Company utilizes equity variance swaps in non-qualifying hedging relationships.
In exchange-traded equity futures transactions, the Company agrees to purchase or sell a specified number of contracts, the value of which is determined by the different classes of equity securities, and to post variation margin on a daily basis in an amount equal to the difference in the daily market values of those contracts. The Company enters into exchange-traded futures with regulated futures commission merchants that are members of the exchange. Exchange-traded equity futures are used primarily to hedge liabilities embedded in certain variable annuity products offered by the Company. The Company utilizes exchange-traded equity futures in non-qualifying hedging relationships.
TRRs are swaps whereby the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between the economic risk and reward of an asset or a market index and the LIBOR, calculated by reference to an agreed notional amount. No cash is exchanged at the outset of the contract. Cash is paid and received over the life of the contract based on the terms of the swap. The Company uses TRRs to hedge its equity market guarantees in certain of its insurance products. TRRs can be used as hedges or to synthetically create investments. The Company utilizes TRRs in non-qualifying hedging relationships.
Primary Risks Managed by Derivatives
The following table presents the gross notional amount, estimated fair value and primary underlying risk exposure of the Company’s derivatives, excluding embedded derivatives, held at:
 
Primary Underlying Risk Exposure
 
December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
 
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Notional
Amount
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Notional
Amount
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
(In millions)
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
Interest rate
 
$
6,419

 
$
1,282

 
$
78

 
$
5,397

 
$
1,921

 
$
90

Foreign currency swaps
Foreign currency exchange rate
 
2,713

 
252

 
135

 
3,187

 
332

 
85

Foreign currency forwards
Foreign currency exchange rate
 
2,935

 

 
77

 

 

 

Subtotal
 
12,067

 
1,534

 
290

 
8,584

 
2,253

 
175

Cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
Interest rate
 
3,121

 
83

 
141

 
3,642

 
705

 

Interest rate forwards
Interest rate
 
450

 
7

 
7

 
675

 
139

 

Foreign currency swaps
Foreign currency exchange rate
 
12,452

 
401

 
660

 
9,038

 
219

 
355

Subtotal
 
16,023

 
491

 
808

 
13,355

 
1,063

 
355

Foreign operations hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency forwards
Foreign currency exchange rate
 
3,182

 
82

 
47

 
2,552

 
43

 
61

Currency options
Foreign currency exchange rate
 
7,362

 
318

 

 
4,375

 
43

 
3

Subtotal
 
10,544

 
400

 
47

 
6,927

 
86

 
64

Total qualifying hedges
 
38,634

 
2,425

 
1,145

 
28,866

 
3,402

 
594

Derivatives Not Designated or Not Qualifying as Hedging Instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
Interest rate
 
107,354

 
3,330

 
1,767

 
83,250

 
5,201

 
2,043

Interest rate floors
Interest rate
 
63,064

 
451

 
346

 
56,246

 
1,174

 
837

Interest rate caps
Interest rate
 
39,460

 
177

 

 
49,465

 
74

 

Interest rate futures
Interest rate
 
6,011

 
9

 
9

 
11,684

 
1

 
38

Interest rate options
Interest rate
 
40,978

 
255

 
243

 
16,328

 
640

 
60

Synthetic GICs
Interest rate
 
4,409

 

 

 
4,162

 

 

Foreign currency swaps
Foreign currency exchange rate
 
9,307

 
133

 
684

 
8,208

 
199

 
736

Foreign currency forwards
Foreign currency exchange rate
 
11,311

 
69

 
359

 
9,202

 
26

 
288

Currency futures
Foreign currency exchange rate
 
1,316

 
1

 
1

 
1,408

 
4

 

Currency options
Foreign currency exchange rate
 
2,265

 
53

 
48

 
129

 
1

 

Credit default swaps - purchased
Credit
 
3,725

 
7

 
51

 
3,674

 
11

 
34

Credit default swaps - written
Credit
 
9,055

 
166

 
1

 
8,879

 
79

 
5

Equity futures
Equity market
 
5,157

 
1

 
43

 
7,008

 
14

 
132

Equity options
Equity market
 
37,411

 
1,344

 
1,068

 
22,920

 
2,825

 
356

Variance swaps
Equity market
 
21,636

 
174

 
577

 
19,830

 
122

 
310

TRRs
Equity market
 
3,802

 

 
179

 
3,092

 
4

 
103

Total non-designated or non-qualifying derivatives
 
366,261

 
6,170

 
5,376

 
305,485

 
10,375

 
4,942

Total
 
$
404,895

 
$
8,595

 
$
6,521

 
$
334,351

 
$
13,777

 
$
5,536


Based on notional amounts, a substantial portion of the Company’s derivatives was not designated or did not qualify as part of a hedging relationship at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. The Company’s use of derivatives includes (i) derivatives that serve as macro hedges of the Company’s exposure to various risks and that generally do not qualify for hedge accounting due to the criteria required under the portfolio hedging rules; (ii) derivatives that economically hedge insurance liabilities that contain mortality or morbidity risk and that generally do not qualify for hedge accounting because the lack of these risks in the derivatives cannot support an expectation of a highly effective hedging relationship; (iii) derivatives that economically hedge embedded derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting because the changes in estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives are already recorded in net income; and (iv) written credit default swaps that are used to synthetically create credit investments and that do not qualify for hedge accounting because they do not involve a hedging relationship. For these non-qualified derivatives, changes in market factors can lead to the recognition of fair value changes in the consolidated statement of operations without an offsetting gain or loss recognized in earnings for the item being hedged.
Net Derivative Gains (Losses)
The components of net derivative gains (losses) were as follows:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
(In millions)
Derivatives and hedging gains (losses) (1)
$
(8,343
)
 
$
(3,158
)
 
$
6,108

Embedded derivatives
5,104

 
1,239

 
(1,284
)
Total net derivative gains (losses)
$
(3,239
)
 
$
(1,919
)
 
$
4,824

______________
(1)
Includes foreign currency transaction gains (losses) on hedged items in cash flow and non-qualifying hedging relationships, which are not presented elsewhere in this note.
The following table presents earned income on derivatives:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
(In millions)
Qualifying hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income
$
135

 
$
111

 
$
98

Interest credited to policyholder account balances
150

 
164

 
214

Other expenses
(6
)
 
(5
)
 
(4
)
Non-qualifying hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income
(6
)
 
(6
)
 
(8
)
Other revenues

 
47

 
75

Net derivative gains (losses)
328

 
476

 
411

Policyholder benefits and claims
(292
)
 
(120
)
 
17

Total
$
309

 
$
667

 
$
803

Non-Qualifying Derivatives and Derivatives for Purposes Other Than Hedging
The following table presents the amount and location of gains (losses) recognized in income for derivatives that were not designated or qualifying as hedging instruments:
 
Net
Derivative
Gains (Losses)
 
Net
Investment
Income (1)
 
Policyholder
Benefits and
Claims (2)
 
Other
Revenues (3)
 
(In millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate derivatives
$
(3,458
)
 
$

 
$
(27
)
 
$

Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives
(1,716
)
 

 

 

Credit derivatives — purchased
(21
)
 
(14
)
 

 


Credit derivatives — written
130

 
1

 

 

Equity derivatives
(3,663
)
 
(25
)
 
(727
)
 

Total
$
(8,728
)
 
$
(38
)
 
$
(754
)
 
$

Year Ended December 31, 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate derivatives
$
(296
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
28

Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives
(660
)
 

 

 

Credit derivatives — purchased
(298
)
 
(14
)
 

 

Credit derivatives — written
150

 

 

 

Equity derivatives
(2,556
)
 
(9
)
 
(419
)
 

Total
$
(3,660
)
 
$
(23
)
 
$
(419
)
 
$
28

Year Ended December 31, 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate derivatives
$
3,940

 
$
(1
)
 
$

 
$
236

Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives
343

 
(9
)
 

 

Credit derivatives — purchased
250

 
6

 

 

Credit derivatives — written
(75
)
 
(1
)
 

 

Equity derivatives
1,178

 
(35
)
 
(87
)
 

Total
$
5,636

 
$
(40
)
 
$
(87
)
 
$
236

______________
(1)
Changes in estimated fair value related to economic hedges of equity method investments in joint ventures; changes in estimated fair value related to derivatives held in relation to trading portfolios; and changes in estimated fair value related to derivatives held within contractholder-directed unit-linked investments.
(2)
Changes in estimated fair value related to economic hedges of variable annuity guarantees included in future policy benefits.
(3)
Changes in estimated fair value related to derivatives held in connection with the Company’s mortgage banking activities prior to the MetLife Bank Divestiture.
Fair Value Hedges
The Company designates and accounts for the following as fair value hedges when they have met the requirements of fair value hedging: (i) interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate assets and liabilities to floating rate assets and liabilities; (ii) foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency fair value exposure of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities; and (iii) foreign currency forwards to hedge the foreign currency fair value exposure of foreign currency denominated investments.
The Company recognizes gains and losses on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedges within net derivative gains (losses). The following table presents the amount of such net derivative gains (losses):
Derivatives in Fair Value
Hedging Relationships
 
Hedged Items in Fair Value
Hedging Relationships
 
Net Derivative
Gains (Losses)
Recognized
for Derivatives
 
Net Derivative
Gains (Losses)
Recognized for
Hedged Items
 
Ineffectiveness
Recognized in
Net Derivative
Gains (Losses)
 
 
 
 
(In millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps:
 
Fixed maturity securities
 
$
42

 
$
(43
)
 
$
(1
)
 
 
Policyholder liabilities (1)
 
(830
)
 
835

 
5

Foreign currency swaps:
 
Foreign-denominated fixed maturity securities
 
13

 
(12
)
 
1

 
 
Foreign-denominated PABs (2)
 
(97
)
 
110

 
13

Foreign currency forwards:
 
Foreign-denominated fixed maturity securities
 
(109
)
 
102

 
(7
)
Total
 
$
(981
)
 
$
992

 
$
11

Year Ended December 31, 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps:
 
Fixed maturity securities
 
$
(4
)
 
$

 
$
(4
)
 
 
Policyholder liabilities (1)
 
(82
)
 
96

 
14

Foreign currency swaps:
 
Foreign-denominated fixed maturity securities
 
(1
)
 
1

 

 
 
Foreign-denominated PABs (2)
 
3

 
(20
)
 
(17
)
Foreign currency forwards:
 
Foreign-denominated fixed maturity securities
 
(51
)
 
50

 
(1
)
Total
 
$
(135
)
 
$
127

 
$
(8
)
Year Ended December 31, 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps:
 
Fixed maturity securities
 
$
(25
)
 
$
22

 
$
(3
)
 
 
Policyholder liabilities (1)
 
1,054

 
(1,030
)
 
24

Foreign currency swaps:
 
Foreign-denominated fixed maturity securities
 
1

 
3

 
4

 
 
Foreign-denominated PABs (2)
 
(24
)
 
(25
)
 
(49
)
Foreign currency forwards:
 
Foreign-denominated fixed maturity securities
 
(25
)
 
25

 

Total
 
$
981

 
$
(1,005
)
 
$
(24
)
______________
(1)
Fixed rate liabilities reported in PABs or future policy benefits.
(2)
Fixed rate or floating rate liabilities.
For the Company’s foreign currency forwards, the change in the fair value of the derivative related to the changes in the difference between the spot price and the forward price is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. For all other derivatives, all components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the component of the change in fair value of derivatives that was excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness was ($2) million, ($4) million and ($3) million, respectively.
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company designates and accounts for the following as cash flow hedges when they have met the requirements of cash flow hedging: (i) interest rate swaps to convert floating rate assets and liabilities to fixed rate assets and liabilities; (ii) foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency cash flow exposure of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities; (iii) interest rate forwards and credit forwards to lock in the price to be paid for forward purchases of investments; (iv) interest rate swaps and interest rate forwards to hedge the forecasted purchases of fixed-rate investments; and (v) interest rate swaps and interest rate forwards to hedge forecasted fixed-rate borrowings.
In certain instances, the Company discontinued cash flow hedge accounting because the forecasted transactions were no longer probable of occurring. Because certain of the forecasted transactions also were not probable of occurring within two months of the anticipated date, the Company reclassified certain amounts from AOCI into net derivative gains (losses). These amounts were ($1) million, $1 million and ($13) million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the maximum length of time over which the Company was hedging its exposure to variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions did not exceed seven years and eight years, respectively.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balance in AOCI associated with cash flow hedges was $375 million and $1.3 billion, respectively.
The following table presents the effects of derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated statements of equity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives in Cash Flow
Hedging Relationships
 
Amount of Gains
(Losses)Deferred in
AOCI on Derivatives
 
Amount and Location
of Gains (Losses)
Reclassified from
AOCI into Income (Loss)
 
Amount and Location
of Gains (Losses)Recognized in Income
(Loss) on Derivatives
 
 
(Effective Portion)
 
(Effective Portion)
 
(Ineffective Portion)
 
 
 
 
Net Derivative
Gains (Losses)
 
Net Investment
Income
 
Other
Expenses
 
 Net Derivative
Gains (Losses)
 
 
(In millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
 
$
(635
)
 
$
20

 
$
8

 
$

 
$
(3
)
Interest rate forwards
 
(59
)
 
10

 
3

 
(1
)
 
1

Foreign currency swaps
 
(165
)
 
(3
)
 
(3
)
 
1

 
3

Credit forwards
 
(4
)
 

 
1

 

 

Total
 
$
(863
)
 
$
27

 
$
9

 
$

 
$
1

Year Ended December 31, 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
 
$
(34
)
 
$
1

 
$
4

 
$
(3
)
 
$
2

Interest rate forwards
 
(17
)
 
1

 
2

 
(1
)
 

Foreign currency swaps
 
(164
)
 
23

 
(5
)
 
1

 
(6
)
Credit forwards
 

 

 
1

 

 

Total
 
$
(215
)
 
$
25

 
$
2

 
$
(3
)
 
$
(4
)
Year Ended December 31, 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
 
$
1,023

 
$
(42
)
 
$
1

 
$
(10
)
 
$
1

Interest rate forwards
 
336

 
31

 
1

 
(1
)
 
2

Foreign currency swaps
 
175

 

 
(6
)
 
2

 
2

Credit forwards
 
18

 
2

 
1

 

 

Total
 
$
1,552

 
$
(9
)
 
$
(3
)
 
$
(9
)
 
$
5


All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
At December 31, 2013, ($23) million of deferred net gains (losses) on derivatives in AOCI was expected to be reclassified to earnings within the next 12 months.
Hedges of Net Investments in Foreign Operations
The Company uses foreign currency exchange rate derivatives, which may include foreign currency forwards and currency options, to hedge portions of its net investments in foreign operations against adverse movements in exchange rates. The Company measures ineffectiveness on these derivatives based upon the change in forward rates. In addition, the Company may also use non-derivative financial instruments to hedge portions of its net investments in foreign operations against adverse movements in exchange rates. The Company measures ineffectiveness on non-derivative financial instruments based upon the change in spot rates.
When net investments in foreign operations are sold or substantially liquidated, the amounts in AOCI are reclassified to the consolidated statements of operations.
The following table presents the effects of derivatives and non‑derivative financial instruments in net investment hedging relationships in the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated statements of equity:
Derivatives and Non‑Derivative Hedging Instruments in Net Investment
Hedging Relationships (1), (2)
 
Amount of Gains (Losses) Deferred in 
AOCI (Effective Portion)
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
(In millions)
Foreign currency forwards
 
$
69

 
$
(50
)
 
$
62

Currency options
 
262

 
36

 

Non‑derivative hedging instruments
 

 

 
6

Total
 
$
331

 
$
(14
)
 
$
68

______________
(1)
During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no sales or substantial liquidations of net investments in foreign operations that would have required the reclassification of gains or losses from AOCI into earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company sold its interest in MSI MetLife, which was a hedged item in a net investment hedging relationship. As a result, the Company released losses of $71 million from AOCI upon the sale. This release did not impact net income for the year ended December 31, 2011 as such losses were considered in the overall impairment evaluation of the investment prior to sale. See Note 3.
(2)
There was no ineffectiveness recognized for the Company’s hedges of net investments in foreign operations. All components of each derivative and non‑derivative hedging instrument’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the cumulative foreign currency translation gain (loss) recorded in AOCI related to hedges of net investments in foreign operations was $233 million and ($98) million, respectively.
Credit Derivatives
In connection with synthetically created credit investment transactions and credit default swaps held in relation to the trading portfolio, the Company writes credit default swaps for which it receives a premium to insure credit risk. Such credit derivatives are included within the non-qualifying derivatives and derivatives for purposes other than hedging table. If a credit event occurs, as defined by the contract, the contract may be cash settled or it may be settled gross by the Company paying the counterparty the specified swap notional amount in exchange for the delivery of par quantities of the referenced credit obligation. The Company’s maximum amount at risk, assuming the value of all referenced credit obligations is zero, was $9.1 billion and $8.9 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company can terminate these contracts at any time through cash settlement with the counterparty at an amount equal to the then current fair value of the credit default swaps. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company would have received $165 million and $74 million, respectively, to terminate all of these contracts.
The following table presents the estimated fair value, maximum amount of future payments and weighted average years to maturity of written credit default swaps at:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2013
 
2012
Rating Agency Designation of Referenced
Credit Obligations (1)
 
Estimated
Fair Value
of Credit
Default
Swaps
 
Maximum
Amount of Future
Payments under
Credit Default
Swaps (2)
 
Weighted
Average
Years to
Maturity (3)
 
Estimated
Fair Value
of Credit
Default
Swaps
 
Maximum
Amount of Future
Payments under
Credit Default
Swaps (2)
 
Weighted
Average
Years to
Maturity (3)
 
 
(In millions)
 
 
 
(In millions)
 
 
Aaa/Aa/A
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Single name credit default swaps (corporate)
 
$
10

 
$
545

 
2.6

 
$
10

 
$
777

 
2.7

Credit default swaps referencing indices
 
26

 
2,739

 
1.5

 
42

 
2,713

 
2.1

Subtotal
 
36

 
3,284

 
1.6

 
52

 
3,490

 
2.2

Baa
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Single name credit default swaps (corporate)
 
24

 
1,320

 
3.1

 
8

 
1,314

 
3.4

Credit default swaps referencing indices
 
73

 
4,071

 
4.7

 
11

 
3,750

 
4.9

Subtotal
 
97

 
5,391

 
4.3

 
19

 
5,064

 
4.5

Ba
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Single name credit default swaps (corporate)
 

 
5

 
3.8

 

 
25

 
2.7

Credit default swaps referencing indices
 

 

 

 

 

 

Subtotal
 

 
5

 
3.8

 

 
25

 
2.7

B
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Single name credit default swaps (corporate)
 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit default swaps referencing indices
 
32

 
375

 
4.9

 
3

 
300

 
4.9

Subtotal
 
32

 
375

 
4.9

 
3

 
300

 
4.9

Total
 
$
165

 
$
9,055

 
3.4

 
$
74

 
$
8,879

 
3.6

______________
(1)
The rating agency designations are based on availability and the midpoint of the applicable ratings among Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”), S&P and Fitch Ratings. If no rating is available from a rating agency, then an internally developed rating is used.
(2)
Assumes the value of the referenced credit obligations is zero.
(3)
The weighted average years to maturity of the credit default swaps is calculated based on weighted average notional amounts.
The Company has also entered into credit default swaps to purchase credit protection on certain of the referenced credit obligations in the table above. As a result, the maximum amounts of potential future recoveries available to offset the $9.1 billion and $8.9 billion from the table above were $90 million and $150 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Written credit default swaps held in relation to the trading portfolio amounted to $10 million in notional and $0 in fair value at both December 31, 2013 and 2012.
Credit Risk on Freestanding Derivatives
The Company may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivatives. Generally, the current credit exposure of the Company’s derivatives is limited to the net positive estimated fair value of derivatives at the reporting date after taking into consideration the existence of master netting or similar agreements and any collateral received pursuant to such agreements.
The Company manages its credit risk related to derivatives by entering into transactions with creditworthy counterparties and establishing and monitoring exposure limits. The Company’s OTC-bilateral derivative transactions are generally governed by ISDA Master Agreements which provide for legally enforceable set-off and close-out netting of exposures to specific counterparties in the event of early termination of a transaction, which includes, but is not limited to, events of default and bankruptcy. In the event of an early termination, the Company is permitted to set-off receivables from the counterparty against payables to the same counterparty arising out of all included transactions. Substantially all of the Company’s ISDA Master Agreements also include Credit Support Annex provisions which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral in connection with its OTC-bilateral derivatives.
The Company’s OTC-cleared derivatives are effected through central clearing counterparties and its exchange-traded derivatives are effected through regulated exchanges. Such positions are marked to market and margined on a daily basis, and the Company has minimal exposure to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to such derivatives.
See Note 10 for a description of the impact of credit risk on the valuation of derivatives.
The estimated fair value of the Company’s net derivative assets and net derivative liabilities after the application of master netting agreements and collateral was as follows at:
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement or a Similar Arrangement
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
 
(In millions)
Gross estimated fair value of derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTC-bilateral (1)
 
$
8,537

 
$
6,367

 
$
14,048

 
$
5,480

OTC-cleared (1)
 
302

 
129

 

 

Exchange-traded
 
11

 
53

 
19

 
170

Total gross estimated fair value of derivatives (1)
 
8,850

 
6,549

 
14,067

 
5,650

Amounts offset in the consolidated balance sheets
 

 

 

 

Estimated fair value of derivatives presented in the consolidated balance sheets (1)
 
8,850

 
6,549

 
14,067

 
5,650

Gross amounts not offset in the consolidated balance sheets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross estimated fair value of derivatives: (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTC-bilateral
 
(4,631
)
 
(4,631
)
 
(4,562
)
 
(4,562
)
OTC-cleared
 
(122
)
 
(122
)
 

 

Exchange-traded
 
(5
)
 
(5
)
 
(19
)
 
(19
)
Cash collateral: (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTC-bilateral
 
(1,679
)
 
(3
)
 
(5,960
)
 
(1
)
OTC-cleared
 
(169
)
 
(7
)
 

 

Exchange-traded
 

 
(44
)
 

 
(151
)
Securities collateral: (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTC-bilateral
 
(2,105
)
 
(1,464
)
 
(3,526
)
 
(875
)
OTC-cleared
 

 

 

 

Exchange-traded
 

 
(4
)
 

 

Net amount after application of master netting agreements and collateral
 
$
139

 
$
269

 
$

 
$
42

__________________
(1)
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, derivative assets include income or expense accruals reported in accrued investment income or in other liabilities of $255 million and $290 million, respectively, and derivative liabilities include income or expense accruals reported in accrued investment income or in other liabilities of $28 million and $114 million, respectively.
(2)
Estimated fair value of derivatives is limited to the amount that is subject to set-off and includes income or expense accruals.
(3)
Cash collateral received is included in cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments or in fixed maturity securities, and the obligation to return it is included in payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions in the consolidated balance sheets. The receivable for the return of cash collateral provided by the Company is inclusive of initial margin on exchange-traded and OTC-cleared derivatives and is included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the consolidated balance sheets. The amount of cash collateral offset in the table above is limited to the net estimated fair value of derivatives after application of netting agreements. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company received excess cash collateral of $104 million and $0, respectively, and provided excess cash collateral of $236 million and $290 million, respectively, which is not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation.
(4)
Securities collateral received by the Company is held in separate custodial accounts and is not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. Subject to certain constraints, the Company is permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral, but at December 31, 2013 none of the collateral had been sold or repledged. Securities collateral pledged by the Company is reported in fixed maturity securities in the consolidated balance sheets. Subject to certain constraints, the counterparties are permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral. The amount of securities collateral offset in the table above is limited to the net estimated fair value of derivatives after application of netting agreements and cash collateral. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company received excess securities collateral with an estimated fair value of $238 million and $161 million, respectively, for its OTC-bilateral derivatives which are not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company provided excess securities collateral with an estimated fair value of $66 million and $0, respectively, for its OTC-bilateral derivatives, $141 million and $0, respectively, for its OTC-cleared derivatives, and $81 million and $40 million, respectively, for its exchange-traded derivatives, which are not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation. 
The Company’s collateral arrangements for its OTC-bilateral derivatives generally require the counterparty in a net liability position, after considering the effect of netting agreements, to pledge collateral when the fair value of that counterparty’s derivatives reaches a pre-determined threshold. Certain of these arrangements also include credit-contingent provisions that provide for a reduction of these thresholds (on a sliding scale that converges toward zero) in the event of downgrades in the credit ratings of the Company and/or the counterparty. In addition, certain of the Company’s netting agreements for derivatives contain provisions that require both the Company and the counterparty to maintain a specific investment grade credit rating from each of Moody’s and S&P. If a party’s credit ratings were to fall below that specific investment grade credit rating, that party would be in violation of these provisions, and the other party to the derivatives could terminate the transactions and demand immediate settlement and payment based on such party’s reasonable valuation of the derivatives.
The following table presents the estimated fair value of the Company’s OTC-bilateral derivatives that are in a net liability position after considering the effect of netting agreements, together with the estimated fair value and balance sheet location of the collateral pledged. The table also presents the incremental collateral that the Company would be required to provide if there was a one notch downgrade in the Company’s credit rating at the reporting date or if the Company’s credit rating sustained a downgrade to a level that triggered full overnight collateralization or termination of the derivative position at the reporting date. OTC-bilateral derivatives that are not subject to collateral agreements are excluded from this table.
 
 
 
Estimated Fair Value of
Collateral Provided:
 
Fair Value of Incremental
Collateral Provided Upon:
 
Estimated
Fair Value of Derivatives in
Net Liability
Position (1)
 
Fixed Maturity
Securities
 
Cash
 
One Notch
Downgrade in
the Company’s
Credit Rating
 
Downgrade in the Company’s
Credit Rating to a Level
that Triggers Full Overnight
Collateralization or Termination
of the Derivative Position
 
(In millions)
December 31, 2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives subject to credit-contingent provisions
$
1,674

 
$
1,530

 
$

 
$
27

 
$
34

Derivatives not subject to credit-contingent provisions
20

 

 
3

 

 

Total
$
1,694

 
$
1,530

 
$
3

 
$
27

 
$
34

December 31, 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives subject to credit-contingent provisions
$
771

 
$
775

 
$

 
$
35

 
$
73

Derivatives not subject to credit-contingent provisions
79

 
100

 
1

 

 

Total
$
850

 
$
875

 
$
1

 
$
35

 
$
73

______________
(1)
After taking into consideration the existence of netting agreements.
Embedded Derivatives
The Company issues certain products or purchases certain investments that contain embedded derivatives that are required to be separated from their host contracts and accounted for as freestanding derivatives. These host contracts principally include: variable annuities with guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs; ceded reinsurance of guaranteed minimum benefits related to certain GMIBs; assumed reinsurance of guaranteed minimum benefits related to GMWBs and GMABs; funding agreements with equity or bond indexed crediting rates; funds withheld on assumed and ceded reinsurance; and certain debt and equity securities.
The following table presents the estimated fair value and balance sheet location of the Company’s embedded derivatives that have been separated from their host contracts at:
 
 
 
December 31,
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
 
(In millions)
Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
Ceded guaranteed minimum benefits
Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables
 
$
247

 
$
439

Funds withheld on assumed reinsurance
Other invested assets
 
38

 
66

Options embedded in debt or equity securities
Investments
 
(145
)
 
(88
)
Other
Other invested assets
 

 
1

Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts
 
$
140

 
$
418

Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts:
 
 
 
 
Direct guaranteed minimum benefits
PABs
 
$
(2,296
)
 
$
923

Assumed guaranteed minimum benefits
PABs
 
1,262

 
2,582

Funds withheld on ceded reinsurance
Other liabilities
 
60

 
162

Other
PABs
 
5

 
17

Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts
 
$
(969
)
 
$
3,684


The following table presents changes in estimated fair value related to embedded derivatives:
 
Years Ended December 31,
  
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
(In millions)
Net derivative gains (losses) (1)
$
5,104

 
$
1,239

 
$
(1,284
)
Policyholder benefits and claims
$
(139
)
 
$
75

 
$
86

______________
(1)
The valuation of guaranteed minimum benefits includes a nonperformance risk adjustment. The amounts included in net derivative gains (losses), in connection with this adjustment, were ($952) million, ($1.7) billion and $1.8 billion for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

us-gaap:DerivativeInstrumentsAndHedgingActivitiesDisclosureTextBlock