Entity information:

NOTE 6 − INCOME TAXES



The pre-tax income from continuing operations on which the provision for income taxes was computed is as follows (in thousands):







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For the Years Ended December 31,



 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

$

(2,928)

 

$

(2,948)

 

$

(1,274)

Foreign

 

7,820 

 

 

7,159 

 

 

9,679 

Total

$

4,892 

 

$

4,211 

 

$

8,405 



The expense (benefit) from continuing operations for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For the Years Ended December 31,



 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

$

(112)

 

$

789 

 

$

1,468 

Foreign

 

1,483 

 

 

1,174 

 

 

1,637 

State

 

110 

 

 

76 

 

 

(26)

Total current

 

1,481 

 

 

2,039 

 

 

3,079 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

(60)

 

 

(1,023)

 

 

(301)

Foreign

 

43 

 

 

16 

 

 

19 

State

 

(7)

 

 

(117)

 

 

Total deferred

 

(24)

 

 

(1,124)

 

 

(282)

Total

$

1,457 

 

$

915 

 

$

2,797 



As of December 31, 2014, we had federal Net Operating Loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $2.3 million.  As of December 31, 2016 and 2015 we had no Federal NOL carryforwards remaining.  As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had state NOL’s of approximately $17.5 million and $17.4 million, respectively.  The state NOL carryforwards expire at various times beginning in 2018 and ending in 2036.  In addition, we have research and experimentation credit carryforwards of approximately $0.3 million which may expire in 2018  and Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) credits of $0.8 million which may expire at various times beginning in 2028 and ending in 2034



In our U.S. Federal income tax returns we historically deducted income taxes paid to various countries. In our 2014 U.S. Federal income tax return we had $2.3 million of NOL carryforwards.  Our income tax calculations have historically been under the regular and AMT regimes found in U.S. tax laws.  The U.S. tax system contains rules to alleviate the burden of double taxation on income generated in foreign countries and subject to tax in such countries.  The U.S. allows for either a deduction or credit of such foreign taxes against U.S. taxable income.  An election to either claim a deduction or credit on such foreign income taxes can be made each tax year, independent from elections made in other years.  A credit reduces a company’s actual U.S. income tax on a dollar-for-dollar basis, while a deduction reduces only the company’s income subject to tax.  We made a comparison of our foreign dividends paid by our foreign subsidiary for which we deducted foreign taxes claimed versus claiming a Foreign Tax Credit (“FTC”) on the dividend paid by the foreign subsidiary.  The dividends received were grossed-up with its corresponding foreign taxes.  The U.S. law requires the offset of taxable income with NOL prior to applying the FTC rules.  We determined it was beneficial for the company to gross-up the foreign dividends paid by the foreign subsidiary for the years 2012 through 2014 and make the election to claim a FTC.  By doing so we fully utilized our December 31, 2014, $2.3 million balance of the federal NOL.  As a result, the company had approximately $2.8 million of FTC’s to carryforward into 2015 and subsequent years as a deferred tax asset.  As of December 31, 2016, our FTC deferred tax asset balance was approximately $4.4 million.

The Company uses the incremental approach to recognizing excess tax benefits associated with equity compensation.  Our $2.3 million of federal NOL’s are primarily windfall excess tax benefit related to stock compensation expense, the benefit of which, if realized, will be an increase to Additional Paid-in Capital (“APIC”) as opposed to a reduction in tax expense.  Due to the aforementioned election to claim a FTC, during the year 2015 $0.8 million of the federal NOL was realized, with a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital. 



Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.  Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):







 

 

 

 

 



As of December 31,



2016

 

2015

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign tax credits carryforwards

$

4,360 

 

$

3,667 

Net operating loss carryforwards - State

 

544 

 

 

540 

Research and development credits

 

303 

 

 

303 

Equity compensation

 

561 

 

 

686 

AMT credit

 

770 

 

 

770 

Depreciable assets

 

71 

 

 

110 

Accrued liabilities and reserves

 

124 

 

 

340 

Total deferred tax assets

 

6,733 

 

 

6,416 



 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Intangibles

 

(1,339)

 

 

(1,512)

Undistributed foreign earnings

 

(662)

 

 

(666)

Accrued liabilities and reserves

 

 -

 

 

(23)

Total deferred tax liability

 

(2,001)

 

 

(2,201)



 

 

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets, before valuation allowance

 

4,732 

 

 

4,215 

Valuation allowance

 

(4,732)

 

 

(4,215)

Net deferred tax  asset

$

 -

 

$

 -



 

 

 

 

 



In conjunction with the acquisition of Evolving Systems Labs in October 2013, we recorded certain identifiable intangible assets. We established a deferred tax asset of $0.1 million at the acquisition date for the expected difference between what would be expensed for financial reporting purposes and what would be deductible for income tax purposes. In September 2015, we established a deferred tax liability of $1.8 million as a result of the acquisition of Evolving Systems NC. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, there was a net deferred tax liability of ($1.3) million and a net deferred tax liability of ($1.5) million, respectively. This net deferred tax liability will be recognized as the identifiable intangibles are amortized.

We continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on the domestic net deferred tax asset, as we have determined it is more likely than not that we will not realize our domestic deferred tax assets. Such assets primarily consist of certain net state operating loss carryforwards, AMT credits and research and development credits.  We assessed the realizability of our domestic deferred tax assets using all available evidence. In particular, we considered both historical results and projections of profitability for the reasonably foreseeable future periods. We are required to reassess our conclusions regarding the realization of our deferred tax assets at each financial reporting date. A future evaluation could result in a conclusion that all or a portion of the valuation allowance is no longer necessary which could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

The benefit for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% to income before income taxes as follows (in thousands):







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For the Years Ended December 31,



 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. federal income tax expense at statutory rates

$

1,854 

 

$

2,392 

 

$

4,595 

State income tax expense, net of federal impact

 

54 

 

 

-

 

 

542 

Foreign Tax Credit

 

(874)

 

 

(3,667)

 

 

-

Foreign rate differential

 

(1,331)

 

 

(449)

 

 

(1,452)

Foreign deemed dividends

 

1,515 

 

 

939 

 

 

1,783 

Undistributed foreign earnings

 

 

 

(221)

 

 

-

Change in valuation allowance

 

517 

 

 

2,415 

 

 

(1,971)

Research and development expenses

 

(604)

 

 

(1,096)

 

 

(867)

Foreign taxes

 

 

 

314 

 

 

53 

Section 78 Gross-up

 

457 

 

 

371 

 

 

-

Permanent differences and other, net

 

(131)

 

 

(83)

 

 

114 

Total tax expense

$

1,457 

 

$

915 

 

$

2,797 



The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position when it determines that it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had no liability for unrecognized tax benefits.  We do not believe there will be any material changes to our unrecognized tax positions over the next twelve months.  Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense (benefit) in the accompanying statements of operations.

Our income taxes payable may be reduced by the AMT tax benefits from employee stock plan awards. We had no net excess tax benefits from employee stock plan awards for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, which would be reflected as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

We conduct business globally and, as a result, Evolving Systems Inc. or one or more of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions.  In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, namely the United Kingdom, Germany and India.  Although carryovers can always be subject to review by taxing authorities, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 2013. 

During 2004, we formed Evolving Systems India, a wholly owned subsidiary of Evolving Systems which is used primarily for product development and customer service and support.  The Company has the intent and current ability to indefinitely reinvest profits of Evolving Systems India for the year ended December 31, 2016. Undistributed foreign earnings for the year ended December 31, 2016 are approximately $1.0 million. Repatriation to the U.S. in the form of dividend distributions from the India controlled foreign subsidiary would give rise to taxation.

Two Indian subsidiaries of SSM were acquired pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 30, 2015.  We have reason to believe there is uncertainty related to the lack of historical US International reporting for these two foreign subsidiaries, and are in the process of determining whether either or both of these subsidiaries are controlled foreign corporations (“CFCs”) within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code and related Regulations, or if a “check-the-box” election has taken place to effectively treat one or both of these subsidiaries as disregarded entities for US federal tax reporting purposes. The Company is in the process of obtaining pertinent information to assess the degree of uncertainty and to quantify related costs or liabilities.