Avianca Holdings S.A. | CIK:0001575969 | 3

  • Filed: 5/1/2018
  • Entity registrant name: Avianca Holdings S.A. (CIK: 0001575969)
  • Generator: S2 Filings
  • SEC filing page: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1575969/000119312518145256/0001193125-18-145256-index.htm
  • XBRL Instance: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1575969/000119312518145256/avh-20171231.xml
  • XBRL Cloud Viewer: Click to open XBRL Cloud Viewer
  • EDGAR Dashboard: https://edgardashboard.xbrlcloud.com/edgar-dashboard/?cik=0001575969
  • Open this page in separate window: Click
  • ifrs-full:DescriptionOfAccountingPolicyForImpairmentOfNonfinancialAssetsExplanatory

      (p) Impairment of non–financial assets

    The Company assesses in accordance with IAS 36 “Impairment of Assets” at each reporting date whether there is an indication that an asset may be impaired. If any indication exists, or when annual impairment testing for an asset is required, the Company estimates the asset’s recoverable amount. An asset’s recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s or cash–generating unit’s (“CGU”) fair value less costs to sell and its value in use and is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets. Where the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.

    In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre–tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. In determining fair value less costs to sell, recent market transactions are taken into account, if available. If no such transactions can be identified, an appropriate valuation model is used. These calculations are corroborated by valuation multiples, or other available fair value indicators.

      

    Impairment losses of continuing operations, including impairment on inventories, are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income in those expense categories consistent with the nature of the impaired asset, except for a property previously revalued where the revaluation was taken to other comprehensive income. In this case, the impairment is also recognized in other comprehensive income up to the amount of any previous revaluation.

    For assets excluding goodwill, an assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognized impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the Company estimates the asset’s or cash–generating unit’s recoverable amount. A previously recognized impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the assumptions used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized. The reversal is limited so that the carrying amount of the asset does not exceed its recoverable amount, nor exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognized in the income statement unless the asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal is treated as a revaluation increase.

    The following criteria are also applied in assessing impairment of specific assets:

    Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of the year end and when circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the cash generating unit to which it pertains may be impaired. Impairment is determined for goodwill by assessing the recoverable amount of each cash–generating unit (or group of cash–generating units) to which the goodwill relates. Where the recoverable amount of the cash generating unit is less than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized. Impairment losses relating to goodwill cannot be reversed in future periods.

    Management has considered the impact of greater than forecasted variations in relevant assumptions in assessing the CGU’s recoverable amount. As a result of the analysis performed a reasonably possible change in key assumptions would not cause the CGU’s carrying amount to exceed its recoverable amount.